The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars?
With the advancement in the transportation field, cars have been used on a larger scale than it was before. Despite of being accessible, the mass usage of cars has induced innumerable by-product that need to be identified so as to find a better approach to solve the issue.
There are three major problems associated with the frequent operation of automobile of which the public could clearly aware. Firstly, since the conveyance discharged utterance into the climate, the dramatic appliance of cars means that more emission will be exposed to the ecosystem. These are the main reasons caused air pollution, or in the worst scenario, causing greenhouse effect. Secondly, due to the efficient of automobile, citizens refused to take other transports with acceleration, which explained the upsurge in the number of vehicles on the street. This has contributed to the traffic jam in the rush hours. Finally, sometimes, driving is not the safe way to travel. According to a report, 80% casualties every year is the consequence of car accidents.
From the dilemmas above, some proposed a resolution is to impose restriction on cars’ operation. However, there is a less severe approach. If the manufacture could produce an environmentally friendly product, which applying solar power or hydrogen, it is then not necessary to worried about the exhaust from such a vehicle. Furthermore, if drivers are educated properly before licensing, safety will be the prioritize.
In conclusion, I deem that there are three primary disadvantages of cars overuse, and deter the usage of cars may not be a permanent cure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e by-product that need to be identified so as to find a better approach to solve the iss...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...operly before licensing, safety will be the prioritize. In conclusion, I deem that there are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22480620155 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0087207742 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658914728682 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0315285926 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164959420733 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440062593081 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445831094623 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093891491889 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391290346735 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.