The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Using the cigarette in the public places has always been a controversial debates between people which finally led to creating rules for smoking prohibition in some places. Recently, the cellphones have faced same situation and different attitudes are presented to use them either. I disagree on establish rules for using mobile phones in according to below reasons.
To begin with, it is obvious that almost each person has a cell phone nowadays and it is not comparable to cigarettes that belongs to special type of people which are in the minority.
As second reason, the cellphones are not annoying as much as cigarettes to others and do not have significant side effects and unhealthy problem. For example, the smoke of cigarettes will be harmful with serious repercussion for others like a smoker. This is an exaggeration to have the same approach about mobile phones that are just annoying occasionally.
Finally, the using mobile phone sometimes are emergency and it is not possible to avoid use it. For example, when you need to talk someone and it is urgent you cannot think about the rules and prohibition, it even may be a matter of life and death.
On the other hand, some people refer to some annoying items like the ringing tone, loud speaking and so on as the effective parameters to convince for limitation of using cellphones.
In conclusion, I personally believe that it is not possible and logical to ban using cell phones. Although using the mobile phone in some cases may be a bit annoyed, but it is inevitable and usual in comparison with its benefits.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-21 tsln7607 67 view
2023-11-21 tsln7607 61 view
2023-11-21 tsln7607 61 view
2023-08-26 Phạm Phương Uyên 78 view
2023-08-25 songuyen14 89 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'debate'?
Suggestion: debate
... places has always been a controversial debates between people which finally led to cre...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in some cases, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89552238806 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72674149494 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548507462687 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2413817219 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2790252899 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973232987227 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555922886843 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127249392599 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560152350122 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.