The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking and is banned in certain places like smoking To what extent do you agree and disagree

Essay topics:

The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking and is banned in certain places like smoking. To what extent do you agree and disagree?

People believe that mobile phone usage is as harmful in society as smoking and we should prohibit it in typical places like smoking. I completely disagree with this point of view due to its potential benefits.
Admittedly, the growing popularity of smartphones currently has both negative and positive effects on society. Not like smoking, however, the smartphone is a technological tool, which is necessary for people's daily life. Frequent smoking has negative health impacts on both individuals and people's surroundings, whereas the use of smartphones just affects those who use them. To illustrate, women who are regularly exposed to second-hand smoke while getting pregnant, are at a high risk of having a child with birth defects and suffering from other complications during pregnancy. Meanwhile, playing on a smartphone frequently just causes vision impairment in people using it. Therefore, smoking is at the expense of their own and others' health, this can go far beyond the use of mobile phones.
With the advantages smartphones bring to people's daily activities, I think that mobile phones should not be banned because of certain reasons. Firstly, In school, mobile phones can be considered teaching tools that support teachers' lectures to become more attractive to their students during class hours. From a working perspective, a smartphone is an indispensable tool for connecting and communicating in a meeting with remote-area business partners. Additionally, using smartphones is less serious than smoking, which leads to severe health issues.
In conclusion, I believe that smartphones play a vital role in individuals' lives so they should not be prohibited.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-27 Ngoc4120 61 view
Essays by user Ngoc4120 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, while, i think, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47876447876 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03533844375 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633204633205 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5896124591 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.153846154 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198138922802 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676195766959 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658119379734 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112127351233 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741752206191 0.056905535591 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.