The table data below shows the top ten Internet users by country in 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the percentage of surfers in the top ten countries in the year 2016.
Overall, China was the leading country with the highest number of internet users, while Mexico accounted for the lowest. Additionally, the UK was top in the list of the percentage of surfers, whereas India was the least in surfers rate.
As for citizens using the internet, China dominated the list with the largest number ( over 721 million people), which also is a half of the country’s total population, followed by the figure for India and the US, ranking 2nd and 3rd at nearly 462 and 286 respectively. By contrast, Mexico had the lowest percentage of surfers ( just over 58 million people), accounting for nearly a half of the country’s total population.
Regarding to the proportion of internet users, the percentage of internet users in the United Kingdom accounted for the biggest with over 92%, however, the total population of this country was the smallest with just over 65 million people. The similar trend was witnessed in Japan, where Internet users was at over 115 million people, making up over 91% of the country’s total population. After which, the figures for the US and Germany were the same with nearly 88%.
- The table data below shows the top ten Internet users by country in 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking and is banned in certain places like smoking To what extent do you agree and disagree 61
- Large companies should pay higher salaries to CEOs and executives compared to other workers To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featur 67
- The graph below shows unemployment levels in Ireland and the number of people leaving the country between 1998 and 2008 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...minated the list with the largest number over 721 million people, which also is a...
^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ico had the lowest percentage of surfers just over 58 million people, accounting ...
^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... country was the smallest with just over 65 million people. The similar trend was...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, so, whereas, while, as for, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97572815534 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63619051363 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504854368932 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3714804863 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.125 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132835733725 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075964103939 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709194035529 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113245946436 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758177145369 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.