The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, with the development of technology, an increasing number of people tend to choose to use social media instead of interacting directly. While there are a few drawbacks of this trend, the benefits are more significant.
On the one hand, there are multiple reasons to believe that using social media to replace traditional meetings is unbeneficial. Firstly, using social networking sites too excessively will make people lack communication skill. To illustrate, when addicted to social media, people can lose their interaction because they tend to use stickers or emoji in order to express their mind and emotion. As a result, this will make them feel difficult to show off their feelings in direct meetings. Furthermore, sharing and talking with virtual friends instead of paying attention to their families may make people, especially young people, become distant from family members.
Despite the negatives mentioned above, this trend is a positive development for various reasons. Firstly, social platforms can help people keep in touch with everybody who they love. For example, students who study overseas, can keep in contact with their family and friends by using social media apps such as Messenger, Twitter,... Moreover, social networking sites are also extremely convenient to exchange information. This is because people will have opportunities to get down to business through texting or calling video instead of discussing directly. Last but not least, social media significantly has changed the way information is transmitted. It can help people update new information more convenient and faster.
Although using social platforms instead of direct communication is negative in a few aspects such as lack of communication skills and becoming distant from family, I strongly believe that the benefits of this trend are more serious to consider
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...al media apps such as Messenger, Twitter,... Moreover, social networking sites are...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50871080139 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87343024821 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574912891986 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3710627309 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17250136842 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641641880016 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556336914271 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110016543453 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385800051475 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.