The use of social media is replacing the face-to-face interaction among many people in society.
Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, using social networking platforms as a substitute for in-person interactions in the community has been debated in many parts of the world. While it is said that this trend can bring some benefits, I strongly believe that drawbacks far outweigh them.
There is no doubt that there are various advantages associated with employing social media to contact other people, one of which is that they make the connection faster and more convenient. Transferring information and interactions between people; for example, used to be complicated in the past as people whose relatives and friends lived far away had to spend plenty of time waiting for their letters or traveling a long distance in order to communicate with the other. However, thanks to virtual platforms, users are able to immediately connect with others instead of consuming time to write letters or prepare schedules to meet someone face-to-face.
Despite the strong arguments above, I find concrete evidence that online communication through social networking platforms can contain downsides. One of them is that people are more likely to become victims of cybercrimes nowadays. By all accounts, social media interactions seem so extremely ubiquitous in society that they can easily receive a message from a stranger who could be a hi-tech criminal. Obviously, the criminal intends to take advantage of the users’ subjectivity to connect with innocent people and commit crimes before the victim could recognize them.
Another main drawback is an increasing social insensitivity highly concerned on many presses in recent times. It is argued that the more social media people use, the more social insensitivity they are. People tend to immerse in keeping in touch by online platforms rather than meet and start a conversation. If this trend happens more frequently, people can face a crisis of silence. Although it seems like a fiction film, no one could confirm that it would no longer occur in the future.
In conclusion, I completely agree that the demerits of social media communication in terms of creating more situations for criminals and making their users insensitive overshadow the merits such as convenience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people believe that giving aid to poorer countries has more negative effects than positive effects To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people Some people think a younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 61
- The maps show the changes of the road access to a hospital between 2007 and 2010 Describe the main features of the maps 73
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task Forested Land 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31232091691 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88803326137 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598853868195 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4208293456 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.6 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238156707848 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742684508523 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04629197511 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120818324113 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391323518597 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.