The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that the Internet and the development of social media is shifting a part of our traditional face-to-face style of communications into online interactions. Although there are a few benefits of conversation via social media, I would argue that the drawbacks are more visible than the advantages.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that social media are great measures to connect people living far from one another. In today's globalized world, scattered family members or friends are no rare, and social media ensures people can keep in touch with their beloved ones anytime and anywhere. For example, parents living in Vietnam can easily see and hear about their children who are studying abroad in Japan, not only their physical appearance but also their living condition, thanks to video calls.
On the other hand, I would argue that there is no substitute for face-to-face interaction. Firstly, social media may discourage real interaction and prevent people from developing social skills. Important elements in proximate conversations includes body languages and skin touches, especially among lovers, or when one is trying to pour comfort into the partner's heart. A concreate example is the fact that countless couples in long-distance relationship break up because daily online conversations cannot compensate for kisses, embraces or touches. Secondly, a stream of continuous dialogue cannot be guaranteed when conducted via the Internet. Low and unstable network quality can interrupt the talk, resulting in participants losing their interest in the conversation or even in their partners.
In conclusion, although most people can now access the internet and social media are widely used, I consider that the lack of personal contact does more harm than good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- Many countries are currently witnessing an increase in criminal activity among young people Discuss reasons for this phenomenon and suggest ways to deal with the problem 89
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 84
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 89
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'partners'' or 'partner's'?
Suggestion: partners'; partner's
... one is trying to pour comfort into the partners heart. A concreate example is the fact ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39928057554 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89090718294 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622302158273 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2907816578 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.083333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190080208552 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734494522283 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691974491247 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118374067168 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433921770267 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.