The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that the usage of social media gradually takes precedence over communication in real life in our society. While I recognize the disadvantages of this development, I believe that it is more likely to have beneficial impacts.
There are a number of detrimental impacts associated with this trend. It is true that when communicating online marginalizes face-to-face interaction, a variety of aspects of a conventional conversation will be lost. For instance, when you send emails or instant messages to each other instead of talking to the other ones in real life, eye contact and body language which are of paramount importance in a conversation will not be incorporated into your interaction. Moreover, emotional expression is not clear in online communication in comparison with face-to-face one. As a result, people cannot expound on their feeling efficiently when they feel up to it and it may cause a host of misunderstands when they interact with their partners and beloved ones.
Notwithstanding the above drawbacks, I believe that they are outweighed by the benefits of online communication. First of all, if the usage of social platforms for communicating purposes became a substitute for face-to-face one, this could bring ease of communication. The reason is that the advent of social media including Facebook or Zalo has done away with geographical adversities, and in turn, enabled everybody to keep in touch with their friends and beloved ones all over the world with ease. Furthermore, commuting online also do wonders for communication between people from different countries. This is because there are a range of translating tools and apps that allow people who are not adept at learning foreign languages to socialize with their overseas friends.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the prospective benefits of this trend is more significant than the possible harms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 73
- The natural resources such as oil forest and fresh water are being consumed at an ever increasing rate What problems does it couse How can we solve these preblems 73
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 73
- Some people think that it is better for older schoolchildren to study a large number of subjects and develop a range of knowledge Others argue that they should study a smaller number of subjects and focus on details Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30794701987 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.242073593 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586092715232 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5715264743 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.307692308 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179676082793 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606933491281 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468719663543 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867237639526 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560288180021 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.