The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The face-to-face communication today is gradually being replaced by online conversations on social media such as Facebook or Twitter. Many hold the view that this trend has a negative impact on frequent users. While I partly agree with this point of view, I believe that they creates more benefits for society than disadvantages.
On the one hand, the reason why I in part agree with some people’s negative viewpoint is that the overuse of social media reduces the quality of interpersonal communication. Many people are so addicted to social media that they always stare at their smartphone screen without paying attention to those around them. Unlike in the past when people devoted most of their leisure time to meeting up and chatting with one another, nowadays in meetings, dates or group work sessions, individuals often interact on social networks more than with the opposite person. So, social media are partly reducing the connection and interaction among humans in present-day society.
On the other hand, I claim that social media help many daily activities to become quicker, more convenient and economical than before. A wide range of human activities today are dependent on these platforms from everyday communication to the exchange of information at work. For example, social media are a powerful marketing tool allowing companies to exhibit their product information and promote them to potential customers. This enables them to save a great deal of time and budget compared to other traditional marketing methods such as in newspapers or on the air.
In conclusion, while I acknowledge some drawbacks of social networks, I believe that these disadvantages bear no comparison with benefits they bring to society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-11 | Huyle121212 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-01 | Eser | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-25 | Eser | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-18 | hungnguyen123 | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-28 | sdfsklagjvpon | 92 | view |
- I think that people should be permitted to use as much water as they want and that the government should not strictly control the supply of this precious commodity 70
- Moving forward half a decade the proportions of people who descriced the hotel s 78
- Various actions need to be simultaneously taken so as to curtail cigarette consumption 84
- The table illustrates how many travelers visited six World Heritage sites in Australia every 2 years from 1996 to 2000
- The second reason why I advocate this trend is that the single child will receive adequate care and home schooling 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...cial media such as Facebook or Twitter. Many hold the view that this trend has a negative...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'create'
Suggestion: create
...this point of view, I believe that they creates more benefits for society than disadvan...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3152173913 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88404659163 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590579710145 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2883747295 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228603844787 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803796337749 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681211737739 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122723296752 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588847508046 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.