Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, there has been a growing debate concerning the effective means of gaining insights into the lives of people around the globe. Many hold the belief that acquiring information about global lifestyles through videos is more effective than reading written materials. From my standpoint, I partially agree with this notion, and I will provide explanations throughout the course of this essay to support my viewpoint.
Undoubtedly, there are several merits when it comes to researching global lifestyles through visual facilitators. One prominent benefit is that watching video recordings is a highly stimulating and entertaining method of learning. This means that photo and sound effects could stimulate their brain, thus, they could retain specific details more effectively. In fact, one study showed that the video-goer learned the material 60% more quickly than the usual reading group. Another positive feature is that visually exciting remedies have access to an unlimited source of information. To extend this point, regardless of the genre, from ancient history to the fairy tale might be discovered on the Internet. Therefore, this is the superior advantage when people use it as an educational tool.
However, a counter-argument is that society lacks strong content regulation on video records. There is little doubt that it might make people possible to inadvertently pick up and retain false information. The conspicuous case-in-point is that pupils are directly affected when they see unorthodox and improper content. Moreover, this way to learn by depicting a piece of art is not possible for all kinds of learners. Therefore, under no circumstances, people should consider choosing a suitable method as well as a source to absorb civilization's history and get positive result ratings.
In conclusion, the debate regarding video recordings enables people to observe things authentically. Personally, while I agree that researching visual structure leaves more of a lasting impact on a human's mind and has diversity in visual sources, I suppose that there is a lack of rigor in verifying information about visual media facilities and this learning style is not suitable for everyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-20 | kevann | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-20 | kevann | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-21 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | dominhthanh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money 89
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school In contemporary society 84
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...o the lives of people around the globe. Many hold the belief that acquiring information a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, i suppose, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53372434018 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01862822137 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609970674487 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3192621751 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154731051049 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441300898969 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399426925114 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907945833896 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018292634494 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.