Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that rich countries ought to give humanitarian aid to underdeveloped nations in times of natural calamities. In my opinion, I completely agree with this statement because wealthy nations have enough resources to support poorer nations and this kind of act would improve relations between countries.
To begin with, first world countries are financially stable and have funds to help during natural disasters. The countries in need face the destruction of their property, loss of human lives and suffer for everything they lose. Therefore, wealthy nations should provide emergency supplies such as clean water, food and clothing to ease affected citizens lives. Also, developed countries often have well-organised search and rescue teams that are essential to prevent further loss. For instance, during 1999 a sudden earthquake struck Istanbul and Germany sent help to the Turkish Government to discover hundreds of people alive under the debris.
Furthermore, countries that received help in times of struggle would be thankful for this kind act. They would give benefits to developed countries such as reduced taxes, cancellation of visas and business agreements. Hence, trade and tourism between the countries would improve and they would have economical advantages. For instance, after their help with the earthquake, Turkey reduced taxes for Germany and since then two nations have good economical relations.
Inclusion, wealthy nations should help poorer countries since they have more ability and funds to deal with disasters. Also, I believe, it is an opportunity to build stronger bonds between the two nations.
- Most modern families have both parents working and as a result children spend less and less time with their parents What is the reason for this What solutions can you suggest 56
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine However at best these methods are ineffective and at worst they may be dangerous To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters Do you agree or disagree 61
- People will buy a product if it fulfills their needs and requirements so there is no need to advertise To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ny and since then two nations have good economical relations. Inclusion, wealthy nations...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, kind of, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.552 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72499541284 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.557741046 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.769230769 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239728836387 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849329419557 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712183932538 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161544228634 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610891933591 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.