When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There has been a debate about the priorities when it comes to pursuing an occupation. While some believe that salary level should be at the top of the list, I partly disagree with this statement. From my perspective, although money is essential for its immediate effects on daily life, there are still significant factors such as job satisfaction or expertise enhancement which should be worth-considered in the long- term.
On the one hand, I agree that the major reason for job seekers to prioritize salary is its aid for daily life basic needs. In fact, there are plenty of expenses needed to be taken care of every day for workers such as housing rental, food, or electricity bills. That’s why most people tend to apply for a well-paid job so the capacity to cover all the living costs would be ensured. On the contrary, when people take an occupation based on their enjoyment and the financial issues cannot be solved, they will not be able to support even themselves. As a result, their interest in what they are doing would be gone even if it is their favorite job. For example, individuals choosing the path of becoming an artist or a musician usually do not guarantee good financial help for their families.
On the other hand, I have a strong belief in a higher importance level of job satisfaction over money because of productivity and mental benefits. It has been proven that working gratification can boost not only work efficiency but also generate happiness for a person in his or her life. In the long run, this would result in the enhancement of expertise as well as promotional prospects of an employee in the organization. Hence, having joy and a good salary at the same time is totally obvious. Take the executives of large cooperation in the world such as Google, for instance, they quit their current job which is a dream for others without any hesitation just to work for a smaller company or run their own business. That shows how much they value satisfaction over the money they earn.
In conclusion, I have no denial of the preference for wages when selecting a job due to its direct financial effect on people’s lives, but I think that the necessity of taking other factors such as job satisfaction into account should also be considered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 80
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- It was predicted that with the development of technology people in the 21st century would have much more free time than past To what extent has this prediction come true 52
- Some people think c and therefore they consider it a waste of time to read news in newspapers or watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The natural resources such as oil forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate What problems does it cause How can we solve these problems 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77721518987 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75297802365 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9356921179 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.9375 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6875 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149912885264 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485028435863 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378858993517 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885176124774 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317749926395 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.