When a country develops its technology ,the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to keep them alive. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

Essay topics:

When a country develops its technology ,the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to keep them alive. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

It is true that technology has much progressed over a couple of decades. Now, the statement sparks a healthy discussion and argument whether traditional skills will completely be wiped out with new technology. I disagree to the statement because it is not going to happen in the coming years.

To begin with, technology has, without doubt, made our lives easier, faster and more comfortable. For instance, making metros, air plane, satellite and spacecraft, which was beyond imagination a few years back, has revolutionized the way of travelling and getting information about anything happening even in space. However, older means of transport like buses and trains are and would continuously stay popular among the masses. Secondly, although the use of technology in medical field has benefited people to live longer, fake and untrained doctors are there to cure more than 60 percent people around the world. Similarly, making a call and having knowledge about what is going on globally is the result of unbelievable changes in information technology. Million thanks to internet and students feel indebted for its huge contribution in education sphere. Classes are, now, more interesting and interactive. E-boards have replaced blackboards and whiteboards. but, a teacher in the classroom is still important and intact.

Moreover, smart home technology, air conditioners and heaters are the modern way to show how people are living luxurious, lavish and aristocratic life. The larger percent of the masses is still enjoying sleeping in the open, building fire, sitting around and eating groundnuts there. For instance, though, gas stove and microwave might be in trend, yet cooking food on hearth has no comparison either in taste or in hygienic aspects. To make it more clear, making millet chapatis and preparing pulses in earthen pot (kuldi) are getting popularity in 5 stars restaurants in my country. In terms of entertaining people, cinemas have been changed into mini or multiplexes, radios into F M radios, the traditional ways of singing and dancing have been modified in live concerts. Nevertheless, listening to songs on FM radio is far more enjoyable and would probably remain in the hearts of millions for years. Similarly, advanced mechanism is fine to cater to the demand of milk and butter, but for a family neither is possible nor healthy option.

In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that traditional skills are dwindling but not vanished due to technological progress. Balanced between the two for the welfare of society would be better idea.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-12-31 Rajesh Poonia 89 view
Essays by user Rajesh Poonia :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 760, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a Million'.
Suggestion: A Million
...able changes in information technology. Million thanks to internet and students feel in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 965, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...e replaced blackboards and whiteboards. but, a teacher in the classroom is still im...
^^^
Line 5, column 616, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ountry. In terms of entertaining people, cinemas have been changed into mini or m...
^^
Line 5, column 681, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed into mini or multiplexes, radios into F M radios, the traditional ways of sing...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, then, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28292682927 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89517023816 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636585365854 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8934238072 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.142857143 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5238095238 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7619047619 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0991391440346 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255686965043 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034144089884 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697614286143 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334898183773 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.