When designing a building, some people think that the intended use of the building should be taken into account as important rather than the outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that when constructing a building, one should consider more upon the purpose and use of the building rather than its exterior appearance. This essay agrees that the intended use of the building should be given more priority. This essay will first discuss why a building with more careful interior plans is more successful and secondly, how the outside look is only a waste of money.
Plans which consider design according to the purpose of the building are more successful and preferred when it comes to the choice of customers. That is to mean, a building architecture and structure are properly developed if the plans are focused on its targeted use. This will lead to more use of spaces available rather than losing spaces for beautiful appearance. As a result, many people willingly purchases or stays in these buildings which delivers excellent comfort and space for their living even though it is new for them. For example, let’s take a movie hall, a lot of customers complain to have comfortable seats while they hardly talk about the theatre appearance.
Secondly, shifting plans too much towards the appearance of a building is only a waste of money. Even though there are many architectural designs available, many of them are too complex as well as expensive to implement. So, if the outward design is given more priority one has to spend more money for these plans which includes extra costs for the construction of design patterns, structures, and paintings which in most of the cases often takes unnecessary space and leads to poor engineering. To illustrate this, the newly developed skyscraper in Texas was a business failure and loss of money since it generated way low revenue due to its uncomfortable structures for day to day living.
In conclusion, I agree that the design of a building should be planned carefully as per their needs rather than their outside appearance because comfort and satisfaction is a must for everyone.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03951367781 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74939763747 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.56484715 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.538461538 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203210341388 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864339744975 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807006109678 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144674142444 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655787013615 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.