Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or
experience.
The debate over whether to exclude males or females from certain careers because of their genders has been ongoing for centuries. Some people may argue that is fair to exclude males or females from certain professors because of their genders. However, I disagree that it is right to exclude people from certain professions based on gender differences. As it will become apparent, I will show and explain my position on this issue.
First, gender does not equal to skills. We used to think that women are not suitable to be mathematicians or scientists. One reasons for this notion may be because of stereotypes, such as women are poor in mathematics. However, there are some women that turn out to be prominent scientists who (and) create benefit for mankind. For example, Marie Curie, a physicist, conducted research on radioactivity. Hence, gender does not represent skills.
Second, although men are generally physically stronger than women, it does not mean that women cannot do the same things as men do. For example, being policemen may be suitable for men due to danger; however, it does not mean that women cannot be a police. There are women who become police officers because there are times when we need a female police officers to do certain jobs, such as dealing with female prisoners. Hence, even if women are comparatively weaker in terms of physique, there are certain jobs that need women.
In conclusion, although men and women are significantly different in terms of physiques, it does mean that it is fair to exclude males or females from certain professors based on their gender differences because gender is not the same as skills and some jobs still need women same as men.
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- Milk and dairy products are rich in vitamin D and calcium substances essential for building and maintaining bones Many people therefore say that a diet rich in dairy products can help prevent osteoporosis a disease that is linked to both environmental and 58
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ysique, there are certain jobs that need women. In conclusion, although men an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95804195804 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64177441824 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479020979021 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9945806391 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311602600775 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108642888782 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908102763164 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209929428098 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860907589597 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.