The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now.
What problems will this cause?
What can be done to solve these problems?
There are numerous towns and urban areas constructed in previous centuries and that were more appropriate and worth living for individuals in those times than they are now. From my perspective, this phenomenon will cause some challenges for people in these areas to adapt to the advancement of current society and several solutions can be used to deal with this issue.
Admittedly, people who live in the long-term towns and cities can suffer from a great number of inferior problems. To begin with, the infrastructures in these areas are outdated and cannot be ensured to provide humans with safe environments which will bring about several risky consequences. To be specific, the structure of the buildings that have not been checked on a regular basis and reconstructed for a long time is capable of resulting in collapse which will be extremely hazardous for humans or even loss of life due to the free-falling debris. Another consequence of this is people living in outmoded towns and cities having difficulty in catching up with the development of the world on account of inefficient equipment in these areas which is hard for inhabitants to follow the ongoing affair and consistent modifications of the world such as insufficient transportations, outdated technological gadgets and others. As a result, will cause backward for the citizens, and it will be one of the typical factors that hinder the economic advancement of a country.
To overcome these challenges, people should propose some reasonable measures or strategies to tackle the consequences of this issue. Firstly, the best solution is related to the subsidy of supreme authorities for the citizens to improve their living conditions and assist them with the investment to upgrade the facilities such road system, accommodations, public transportation and other things that are essential for their daily life. On the other hand, the local government had better commute to these areas to strike up a conversation with each resident to persuade them to reconstruct the old buildings together with a view to guarantee safety and get rid of dangerous repercussions or they can make these ancient towns and cities become a tourist-oriented area for both domestic and foreign tourists to prolong the existence of these areas.
In short, various solutions can be used to solve the consequences of residing in the towns and cities that were built a long time ago. With the assistance of the supreme authority, they can invest money on allocating more innovative facilities, encourage people to maintain their original state and promulgate it to more people as a way of increasing prestige to foster the financial progress.
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The picture illustrates the disparity of a park named Grange Park between 1920 and today 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, as to, in short, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 433.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21016166282 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0405610843 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531177829099 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 714.6 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.058012536 49.4020404114 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.0 106.682146367 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0833333333 20.7667163134 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319093443595 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123795082187 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712896081721 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212761444155 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835755872646 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.0946893788 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.