The world should have one government rather than a national government for each country. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Recently, it has been proposed that the world should only be governed by a single administration in lieu of a nationwide government for each region. Much as I agree with the benefits of this trend, I believe they can not outweigh the adversities that are entitled to it.
Those who support the trend of one government for the whole world provide a number of plausible points for their approval. Firstly, combining all governments into one would be an ideal tactic to prevent wars between different regions. A combined system of government would better ensure the world of looming conflicts and disputes. Secondly, racism, one of the ever-concerned issues between different regions on a global scale, would be diminished with the approval of government combination.
However, that the world is governed by a single administration would prove to be impractical in a variety of aspects. Firstly, assembling all governing administrations would undermine each country’s originality. It has been widely acknowledged that the government plays a huge role in preserving the nation’s cultural features, which comprises its cuisine, traditional clothes, distinctive ways of communicating and, last but not least, its religion. With the up-brought trend, communities on the global scale are posed with the threat of losing their individuality due to governmental adjustment. Moreover, the educational features of distinctive countries would be a looming downside of such a conspicuous trend. As an illustration, school curriculums are designed to fit with the status quo of each different nation. Uniforming government might as well bring up amendments to the education system, baffling knowledge seekers of different countries with unfamiliar and unnecessary sources of information.
The aforementioned discussion has made it clear that, combining governments, although beneficial in aspects rewarding the demise of racism and war, is an impossible way of governing the world when it comes to more diverse traits namely nation’s originality and education.
7.5 well done with clear argument and supporting details
strong use of language structures and vocabulary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-01 | oanhnth | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | oanhnth | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | oanhnth | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
- In some countries only few young people go to classical music concerts or or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 61
- discuss the pros and cons of public transport 56
- Many countries want to host international sports events while other countries think that hosting sports events has more problems than benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 56
- discuss the pros and cons of learning foreign language 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icial in aspects rewarding the demise of racism and war, is an impossible way of ...
^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th clear argument and supporting details strong use of language structures and vo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62996941896 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26734618102 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599388379205 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2216967917 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.733333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292978836802 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102045800849 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751013813275 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124085753543 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980531755174 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.