The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country. Do the advantages outweigh this advantage?
With globalization accelerating at a rapid pace, there have been growing calls to have only one global government, which would motivate countries to unify towards resources and international policies. To the best of my knowledge, the drawbacks of this growing trend outstrip the benefits for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that there are many member nations abusing their power to serve their own interests rather than those of the entire world. Nowadays, many studies have shown that although it is invisible, the growing trend of global collaboration is accompanied by the increasing intertwined conflict among countries all over the world. Furthermore, it will be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that establishing a global government has resulted in reducing cultural diversities and identities. As a result, this phenomenon can affect international relations about economics and politics.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by opponents to this is that this policy could encourage member countries to collectively contribute to solve common problems. According to researches, a global government would be able to act faster in solving issues effectively because they would have more resources at their disposal. For instance, according to survey conducted by BBC News, a single government could better protect residents by enacting strict laws that force all citizens to get vaccinated against Covid-19. This argument could be true to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account is the fact that due to different traditional and cultural perspectives, it could lead to inconsistent measures in tackling issues of each country. Furthermore, it can take a long time and high budget to build a unified global system in all fields.
In conclusion, a single government for the entire planet could help resolve global issues but would limit the distinctiveness of each individual nation as mentioned above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49834983498 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10626459585 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597359735974 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8957398571 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.153846154 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224021831188 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685397102571 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372646731871 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135104720679 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138112898748 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.