The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country.
Do the advantages out outweigh the disadvantages?
The concept of cosmocracy has been proposed for some time now, with the ideal thought that there should be only one government in the world rather than separate national governments. This idea, albeit with certain advantages, would potentially create insoluble problems.
The possibility of conflicts between regions, to some proponents, would be solved at ease by the global mono-government. The US federal government can serve as an instance; it has been addressing problems among the states since its establishment. However, this government can work effectively due to the fact that it only functions in a small range of over 50 states, and most citizens have faith in the united constitution and values such as capitalism and individualism. On the contrary, the unitary government seems to be imaginary because it would hold thousands of states with diametrically differing ideologies. This fantasy-like authority would actually not necessitate compromises but even worsen conflicts. So the cosmocratic system sounds very impractical to the core.
Some theorists, however, postulated a more advanced idea that global issues could be tackled more effortlessly by a single universal government. To be more specific, taxes could be equally collected and wealth redistributed to economically disadvantaged zones; starvation, income inequity and poverty would be resolved. This might capture the interest of many listeners for the first time, but in fact, there lies a potential insecurity in it. Tax payers in richer areas, despite paying more, would receive very little money in return, which would eventually trigger resentment, unrelenting demonstrations and social unrest.
Perhaps the idea of no boundaries with immigration appears to be the most convincing argument. The united government would necessitate swarms of people traveling from countries to countries without any strict verification procedures. Migrants, as a result, would come to thriving cities in hope of better jobs, thus making those places economic concentrated areas. But in the long run, the problem would arise unequivocally in this scenario. Stiffer competition for jobs, traffic and housing would soon be present, and worst of all, those cities would be a breeding ground for crime of any kinds.
In summary, the benefits of a universal centralized government may sound potent initially, but they are totally dominated by its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-25 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that traditional culture is being damaged as it is used as a tool for making money in the tourism industry Others think it is the only way to protect culture and tradition Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The bar charts show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia Darwin 1 Sydney 2 Melbourne 3 Brisbane 4 Perth 5 and Canberra 6 in October 2009 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty in three states in USA 75
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference center in 2010 and 2025 as proposed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, in fact, in summary, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59945504087 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10920077531 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640326975477 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1829151091 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.166666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159974203367 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466123928172 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769182343598 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100107352379 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759088476617 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.