The world today is a safer place and government should stop spending larger amounts of money on their armed forces Do you agree or disagree

In this day and age, putting effort into protecting the homeland is playing a crucial role due to existing other national threats. Whether bearing in mind that the contemporary world is a better place to decline our investment in military services can be deemed as a debate. In spite of the fact that some might either advocate or refute this notion, I tend to see it as a double edge sword.

Some reasons can be provided to support this belief, the first of which is that central governments tend to solve their problems with communications. In other words, they try to put forward their desires through some diplomatic ways in conflict with other nations since they are aware of the war consequences either for their people or the other countries' citizens. If one of the politicians goes further from their responsibility, the others will not take this the whole nation's purpose. In order to illustrate, a diplomat was criticized for his behavior in front of other national communities ten years ago, and nobody takes serious his act.

In contrast, some believe that providing protection should not be neglected, the main argument is that weakness in military forces can lead to losing the government power, which means that the safety of the country can be threatened due to the lack of sufficient army forces. Although politicians should not follow violence with their soldiers, having a potent, considerate enforcement is inevitable. For instance, in the last few decades, some small nations decide to destroy their military by devoting less financial resources to them and as a result, they had to pass their possessions to some brutal attackers.

In conclusion, having contemplated overall influential factors, I tend to opine that this idea can be both supported to some extent and opposed due to mentioned arguments. Therefore, I stand in the middle of the ground.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, in other words, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05466237942 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8084161607 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59807073955 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.0215112454 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0864101822628 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315144660499 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284998424418 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047139891057 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353398422936 0.056905535591 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.