Write about the following topic Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from

Essay topics:

Write about the following topic:
Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Write at least 250 words.

More and more teenagers today smoke a lot, which is bad for their health and also affects their respiratory system. But some people think that smoking affects their freedom. In this essay, I will discuss this topic.
On the one hand, by banning smoking in public places, people's health is improved, and the air is not polluted. In other words, when the smoking rate goes down, we have a reduced chance of getting lung cancer and a healthier respiratory system, for example. Like Singapore, if you don't smoke in the right place, you will be fined 300 dollars. In my view, the government can build more areas for smokers. Smoking should be banned altogether. Let’s consider children who are constantly surrounded by smokers. As they see the older kids smoking, they are clearly influenced and may eventually become addicted to smoking.
On the other hand, when being banned from smoking takes away their freedom. In addition, tobacco can help people to release huge pressure and calm down when they are under pressure. And 28% of European adults are regular smokers but they cannot freely choose where they would like to smoke. For example, when they stop smoking, this is problematic for business. It used to be commonplace for people to smoke in pubs and clubs. But when smoking bans are enforced in public establishments, smokers seek other places to enjoy their smoking in peace. Beside that, the goverments get reduced revenues from tobacco taxes. A ban takes freedom away from people. They argue that people should have autonomy to decide what kind of lifestyle they want. 
In conclusion, we should be careful about what we do and how we act. We should think about the people around us and play the part of a responsible citizen.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-27 TLan168 61 view
2023-03-27 TLan168 61 view
2021-11-14 Prakreeti 78 view
2021-09-18 deolkuljeet1991 61 view
2021-09-18 deolkuljeet1991 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...em, for example. Like Singapore, if you dont smoke in the right place, you will be f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...decide what kind of lifestyle they want.  In conclusion, we should be careful abou...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, as for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in my view, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88175675676 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41148781171 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7114223966 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.25 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257529351478 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084469864129 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647301364292 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147149573459 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465721186793 0.056905535591 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.