You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Different people have different approaches to life. Some prefer daily routines while others enjoy having new experiences. Which category do you fall into and why? Give reasons for your answer and use specific examples to support your answer.
You should write at least 250 words.
Different people have different approaches to life. There have been people who are looking for stable daily routines life. Meanwhile, other people enjoy having different experiences to gain knowledge.
People prefer unchanged daily routines because they are afraid of the unknown risks an unstable life could bring. The average millennial workers often think their day-to-day office work is tedious. Still, they accept doing those jobs every day simply because they believe such a steady job will help them become more financially secure in old age. Secondly, some people find it perfectly comfortable to live a settled life. They do not need to learn about new things in the outside world. They love to live a peaceful life with their family.
On the other hand, a colorful life with new experiences bears numerous benefits. Firstly, having different backgrounds makes a person gain knowledge daily, thereby developing themselves. Currently, in a dynamic world, most companies, will hire people with rich experience due to the fact these people can quickly adapt to new situations. Secondly, living a colorful life helps people to have more faith in life by finding more joy in different aspects of life. It is a fact that the suicide rate in developed countries with a day-to-day work culture like Japan is increasing; they even have a forest called the suicide forest. One of the reasons for this alarming situation is that Japanese workers are losing interest in life after days of doing similar jobs. Experiencing new things helps people be more curious about life, thereby improving problems like the one in Japan.
In conclusion, several reasons explain why people prefer an unchanged daily routine. However, in my perspective, the benefits of a life full of experiences hugely outweigh that of a stable life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | Luisjackiet | 80 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | Luisjackiet | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
- Social and modern trends are difficult to follow these days and it s widely believed that they primarily exist just to make the living more colorful especially online Some people believe that we shouldn t follow them and that we should live in what we are 67
- Many people think there is a general increase in anti social behavior and a lack of respect for others What do you think are the causes of this and how to improve it What solutions can you suggest 73
- Some employers are giving increased importance to employing people with good social skills in addition to good qualifications Do you agree or disagree that social skills are as important as good qualifications for success in a job 73
- The treat of nuclear power weapons maintains world peace Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that employees should be a part of decision making in their own respective organisations while others say that the top should take the decisions Discuss both the views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any rele 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'routines'' or 'routine's'?
Suggestion: routines'; routine's
...people who are looking for stable daily routines life. Meanwhile, other people enjoy hav...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21768707483 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58560681087 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585034013605 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4739626104 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2222222222 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296089796593 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111116203607 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875476698306 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209676289128 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111620370954 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.