You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Sports have the power to bring people together, and as a result, it is not surprising to see international sporting events drawing enormous crowds. It is believed by some that hosting these events is beneficial for a country, while from others’ points of view, such events pose a negative influence. This essay will closely examine both positions before giving my opinion regarding this matter.
There are several reasons why hosting international sporting competitions is positive for a country. First of all, the organization of such events will greatly invigorate the country’s sporting movement; therefore, the host country’s athletes will be roused to compete for the sake of patriotism and national glory. Take China, for example; the country’s achievement at the Olympic Games in recent decades was second to the US’s in every event save for 2008, when China hosted the Beijing Olympics and was the frontrunner in terms of gold medals. Additionally, hosting international sports events will also help place the host country on the world map of tourism. Through the imagery displayed in the media, the host can create a lasting impression on international audiences and become a popular destination even long after the competition has concluded.
On the other hand, being a host of international sporting events can be unfavorable due to several factors. Firstly, the host country will incur a gigantic amount of public debt from loans that have to be taken to construct new sporting facilities and upgrade existing ones. Understandably, this not only takes a toll on the public budget but also opens up a host of opportunities for corruption through kickbacks and dubious dealings. Secondly, the lives of local people may be disrupted because of the policies implemented while making event preparations. In a country that is well-known for hiring foreign immigrants to perform construction projects, like Saudi Arabia, for instance, having a huge influx of laborers from overseas to build large sporting facilities will likely cause social friction with the locals. As a whole, these expenses are more significant than one might think, and will make hosting an international sports competition hardly a worthy endeavor.
In conclusion, I tend to agree with the opinion that hosting international sporting events is detrimental to the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-17 | Duong12345 | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | Urvashi Singh | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-27 | zarutopath | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | sonicmaster | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | hieupham01 | 61 | view |
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagrams below show the stages of the erosion of the headland 87
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38544474394 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98095660007 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587601078167 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8697134112 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.2 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7333333333 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267072277597 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971245862853 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371174803617 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174960918845 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414839620408 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38544474394 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98095660007 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587601078167 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8697134112 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.2 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7333333333 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267072277597 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971245862853 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371174803617 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174960918845 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414839620408 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.