Younger individuals are happier with life than elderly folks are. Do you agree or disagree?
Happiness is currently a subject of significant consideration. Some people think the young lead a more enjoyable life than the older, given how young they are. I believe that the elderly have more happiness in their lives due to the stability in their mental state and better healthcare.
Granted, younger people have fewer age-related changes to contend with. They have no worries about health problems, such as musculoskeletal diseases, and can lead a more carefree life. Younger individuals dependably enjoy greater freedom and can experience all other aspects of life without any worries. However, societal expectations fail to be factored in measuring how happy the young generation is. Youth, again being what other people expect them to have, is one of the reasons why young people have more burdens to contend with. Not only may they experience existential crisis and instability in many aspects of life, entailing finance or schooling, but they also suffer from depression and have low levels of happiness and satisfaction. This situation has been reported in research stating that those in their 20s and 30s have reported having multifaceted problems, some of which they have extreme difficulties to deal with.
Meanwhile, some contend older people lead a happier life because of their stability and the help of technologies in medical treatment. Although it is true that they, those in their later years, experience problems with their well-being, there are more stabilities in their life. They have little disconcertment relating to finance or relationships since they have acknowledged and obtained enough understanding of the situations that they have concerns in the past. For example, those over 60 reportedly have enough income from their retirement pension. The implication of this is that fewer worries about earning and payment for basic necessities. Another reason is the help of advancement in healthcare equipment assists old people in improving their well-being. Technologies have been developed to the level that can offer treatments for numerous ailments except for some chronic diseases. This gives the older generation a chance to be treated better in medical institutions, resulting in profound well-being and increased longevity.
In conclusion, although the young can have happiness on account of their youth, they are not likely to regulate their mentality. I believe that older individuals have more satisfaction in life given the stability in their lives and better medical treatment.
- In some countries there are more young people choosing to enrol in work based training instead of attending university Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 73
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 89
- In some countries there are more young people choosing to enrol in work based training instead of attending university Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 73
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 84
- Some think that people are responsible for their happiness Others feel that happiness depends on other factors in their life Discuss both views and give your own opinion 93
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...r worries about earning and payment for basic necessities. Another reason is the help of advancem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, while, except for, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45524296675 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92536615695 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526854219949 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3725170974 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.65 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.55 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0953733606111 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351031987233 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395881238407 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660956203641 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215075552542 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...r worries about earning and payment for basic necessities. Another reason is the help of advancem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, while, except for, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45524296675 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92536615695 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526854219949 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3725170974 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.65 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.55 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0953733606111 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351031987233 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395881238407 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660956203641 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215075552542 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.