2. Scientific research should be funded by governments rather than commercial organizations. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the continuously revolutionary scientific realm, the issue of funding the research is highly debatable. Some people are of the view that such research should only be government funded whereas, another group asserts the idea that commercial funding is a more rational approach. I firmly believe and agree with the first school of thought that scientific inquiries and developments should only be conducted through Government funding.
To begin with, government-funded research is more beneficial in terms of long-term benefits. The government has long-term plans and such discoveries are aligned with the government objectives and missions pertinent to mass betterment. Similarly, Government-driven research is widespread as the results need to be disseminated across the country. The impact trickles down to different sectors or organizations which eventually benefits the whole society.
On the contrary, commercial-driven developments are more for monetary benefits. These researches are conducted in a narrow environment for a short duration to satisfy certain needs. The information is not disbursed to a larger audience owing to conflict of interest and to avoid competition. Conversely, Government-funded research is for longer periods and is well-conducted for far-fetched results. They are detailed and result-oriented for significant impact on the country or across borders. Hence, opting for developments under Government financial governance is a wise choice.
In conclusion, I would like to reiterate my point that inquiries supervised by the Government are far more substantial in terms of sustainability, mass impact, and scaled-up knowledge sharing. As compared to commercial funding which has short-sighted benefits and is primarily conducted for financial gain to a specific group or organization.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-02 | Amna Zeeshan | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-02 | Amna Zeeshan | 67 | view |
- 3 Some people think mobile cell phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task Although you have never formally studied computing you have always been interested in computers You have just read about a computer course that really interests you but it is only for people who have complete 73
- Although you have never formally studied computing you have always been interested in computers You have just read about a computer course that really interests you but it is only for people who have completed an elementary course Write a letter to the co 73
- The diagram below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years The evolution of the horse with particular emphasis on the changing foot structure Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on the country or across borders. Hence, opting for developments under Government...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, hence, if, similarly, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9391634981 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5590775377 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570342205323 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3943753691 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.133333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258975257709 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860113347136 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644053282591 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159874123613 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946900697516 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.