2. Scientific research should be funded by governments rather than commercial organizations. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the continuous revolutionary scientific releam, the issue of funding the research is highly debatable. Some people are of the view that such research should only be government funded whereas, another group asserts the idea that commercial funding is a more rational approach. I firmly believe and agree with the first school of thought that scientific inquiries and developments should only be conducted through Government funding.
To begin with, government-funded research is more beneficial in terms of long-term benefits. Government has long term plans and such discoveries are aligned with the government objectives and missions pertinent to mass betterment. Similarly, Government driven research is widespread as the results need to be disseminated accross the country. The impact trickles down to different sectors or organizations which eventually benefits the whole society.
On the contrary, commercial driven developments are more for monetary benefits. These researches are conducted in a narrow environment for a short duration to satisfy certain needs. The information is not disbursed with a larger audience owing to conflict of interest and to avoid competition. Conversely, Government funded researches are for longer periods and are well-conducted for far fetched results. They are detailed and result-oriented for significant impact on the country or across border. Hence, opting for developments under Government financial governance is a wise choice.
In conclusion, I would like to reiterate my point that inquiries supervised by the Government are far more substantial in terms of sustainability, mass impact and scaled-up knowledge sharing. As compared to commercial funded which has short-sighted benefits and is primarly conducted for financial gain to a specific group or organization.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-02 | Amna Zeeshan | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-02 | Amna Zeeshan | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 73
- Your friend invited you to go with him her to a concert next week however you are unable to come Write a letter to your friend In your letter let your friend know why you can t go to the concert suggest another activity you can do together explain why you 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...long-term benefits. Government has long term plans and such discoveries are aligned ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 506, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on the country or across border. Hence, opting for developments under Government...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, hence, if, similarly, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82771535581 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31846196587 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565543071161 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9049978669 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.733333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257297933929 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860113347136 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644053282591 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159748554709 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947739497872 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.