5. It has been suggested that all young adults should be required to undertake unpaid work helping people in the community. Would the drawbacks of such a requirement be greater than the benefits to the community and the individual young adults?
In contemporary society, a mandate to perform unpaid community service is a heated debate nowadays. while this approach has enormous benefits, it has some adverse affects as well on an individual as well as on the society. The essay shall discuss both perspectives in detail to evaluate the potential impact.
Predominantly, the intent for implementing free-of-charge society service is to inculcate empathy in young people towards the community. This certainly has a lot of merits such as attachment to community people, understanding of issues and exploring resolutions. Similarly, by actively participating in such activities, individuals can develop crucial life skills such as team leadership, communication skills and teamwork.
On the contrary, there are some disadvantages if the proposal is implemented as mandatory. The young generation is already over-occupied with their academic and career-related challenges. They would perceive this activity as an additional burden and would carry it out unwillingly. Resultantly, the desired outcome will not be achieved. Rather there would be resentment and counterproductive behavior.
Furthermore, implementing this idea as an essential requirement is a violation of one's fundamental freedom of opting for an activity. Owing enforcement by the authorities, would lead to negative performance and irritable behaviors by the individuals.
In conclusion, the importance of participating in society services cannot be overlooked. However, imposing forcefully shall have more adverse effects than positives. A striking balanced approach of implementing it voluntarily is rational. Individuals will willingly opt for the activity and dedicatedly participate without hurting their liberty or routine schedule.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-02 | Amna Zeeshan | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-02 | Amna Zeeshan | 61 | view |
- 1 Ambition is a positive quality for people to have in society today How important is it for people who want to succeed in life Is it a positive or negative characteristic 73
- Many people feel that most of the urgent problems can only be solved by international cooperation To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 73
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- 5 It has been suggested that all young adults should be required to undertake unpaid work helping people in the community Would the drawbacks of such a requirement be greater than the benefits to the community and the individual young adults 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ty service is a heated debate nowadays. while this approach has enormous benefits, it...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...e desired outcome will not be achieved. Rather there would be resentment and counterpr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, similarly, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.072 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.544 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9294712324 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.2941176471 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7058823529 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176305821365 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046909872514 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326258632436 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830352193024 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033740364087 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.43 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.33 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.09 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.