The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given diagram illustrates the number of people went to cinema throughout the week from the period of 2003 to 2007. This is pretty evident from the graphs that people tend to enjoy cinema mostly on Saturday's owing to off from work.
Starting from Monday where very less people go to cinema to maximum people going on Saturday's. This pattern seemed be stagnant for all the given years.
Now, looking at the picture from an yearly analysis perspective, it is clear that number of people going to cinema in 2003 has a steady approach and keeps on increasing every day except Sunday where it indicates a backward trend. 2005 and 2007 years shows a similar trend where number of people going seems to be growing throughout the week with a diminishing trend on Sunday.
However, it we look at the picture from comparison perspective, it is prominent to notice that overall audience count increased in 2005 as compared to 2003 and then decreasing trend is shown in 2007. So collectively, in the year of 2005, the maximum number of people watched cinema through the whole week.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-09 dorae 75 view
2021-10-24 nganphuong05 78 view
2021-09-16 anna103 view
2021-09-16 anna103 84 view
2021-09-16 anna103 10 view
Essays by user Amna Zeeshan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 33, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...work. Starting from Monday where very less people go to cinema to maximum people g...
^^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ars. Now, looking at the picture from an yearly analysis perspective, it is clea...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78494623656 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46984355422 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0606963769 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167678612788 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817199380134 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561198167841 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110059875714 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362337999861 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.