Celebrity centric journalism is more common in media these days. Much attention to lifestyle of famous personalities is mainly because of viewers rating to the programmes in channels. In order to raise their stakes, both print and digital networks, have a closer look over film stars and other public figures. However, in my opinion, invading private life of celebrities for sake of viewers attention is not only breach to fundamental rights but also toxic to the society. In this essay, we will try to pursue the issue from both angles and try to conclude with few examples supporting my stand on the subject matter.
Paparazi culture, term invented in 19th century to describe freelance photographers taking pictures of politicians and artists, lead to beginnings of new chapters called 'tabloid Journalism'. Thenceforth, for want of sensation publishers and journalist used their newly invented hand cameras to capture images of well known individuals while they attend their routine work. Whereas, these incidents went out of context and sometimes even turned as life threatening movements. For instance, death of Princess Diana can be closely related to this problem and stands as best example to describe ill effects of this scenario. Similarly, overwhelmed attention by public because of unnecessary focus given by media will have psychological effects over famed people. Especially, as an example, athletes often complain about these sort of situation and rise their concern about how it can result in their underperformance.
All that being said, there is substantial responsibility on charismatic persons to behave responsible. According to Deena, Times News Editor, media exerts an invisible force on people so that they know their every move is being watched. Nevertheless, these reasons don't give unwarranted permission to reporters for interfering in personal activities of anyone's life. Media experts opine that heavy competition in market leading television streamers no choice but to engage in gossiping about people in lime light. Recent phenomena's like death of bollywood actor and controversial role played by media is standing testimony supporting my argument. Certainly, press and satellite channels are fourth estate to any nation provided their actions are bounded by ethics and morals enshrined in their code of professional conduct.
In a nutshell, whether celebrity or not, we all have duty to respect privacy of other individuals. Therefore, corporate media networks should keep in mind silver lining difference difference between being a watch dog and annoying paparazzi. Afterall, every one in society has to play by same rules irrespective of their social status.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the subject matter. Paparazi culture, term invented in 19th century to describ...
^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erm invented in 19th century to describe freelance photographers taking pictures ...
^^
Line 3, column 818, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
... example, athletes often complain about these sort of situation and rise their concern abo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ng watched. Nevertheless, these reasons dont give unwarranted permission to reporter...
^^^^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...In a nutshell, whether celebrity or not, we all have duty to respect privacy of o...
^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: difference
...works should keep in mind silver lining difference difference between being a watch dog and annoying ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...ing a watch dog and annoying paparazzi. Afterall, every one in society has to play by sa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, while, as to, for instance, sort of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50480769231 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9194016305 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 176.041082164 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673076923077 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9132253251 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256579390351 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608490987086 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402394443138 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132630593962 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437866881575 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 78.4519038076 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.