asuss
Globally, it has been seen that the usage of close circuit cameras proliferating gradually on roads to diminish some offensive activities, however, some people consider this development as negative because it creates obstacles to their personal life. This essay would argue that such new evolvement provides emergency information regarding criminal's movement considered and security considered as benefits fat outweigh its negative sides of capturing one's private life.
Undoubtedly, these new digital cameras are well-equipped with a huge storage memory and crystal clear views. Because of this, while any kind of uncommon activities performed in the range of these cameras, it directly stored it and at the time of the investigation, it helps a lot to the investigator to provide camera footage of incident happened in the past. For example, in India, police had caught some minded robbers who had attempted to rob the ICICI bank last year. In addition, I believe that these instruments are providing security to human being's premice in their absence.
Nevertheless, many orthodox mindset individuals consider this technology as a negative influence on society. This is because, in their views, many people try to capture their images without having their prior permission. As such a class of people has a fear of misusing their privacy, they are not supporting this trend and avoid going to such places that have these devices. For instance, in India, many elderly people not allowing their granddaughters to go to public places because they have a fear of other people who are viewing them with these devices. Although they have this negative mindset, they are not able to catch any burglars in the case of any offensive situations.
In conclusion, although these digital equipment have creates issues for some people for their movement, I believe that these instruments provide a fruitful result to communities in terms of security and giving enough proof to find a person who involved in any bad activities far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-15 | Saumilshah62802@gmail.com | 11 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32615384615 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8110618348 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.7493237585 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.25 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0833333333 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.