In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
In Britain, old people often prefer to live in old age homes where they are assisted by nurses and have other old companions to spend time with, the Government has to pay for this quite often. In my opinion, I believe that the Government should bear all the expenses of the old age homes of its geriatric population.
Firstly, the old generations have contributed to building a country by paying taxes when they were young, so the government ought to provide them with assistance in old age. In other words, they have been the building blocks of their country and spend a big fraction of their earning towards the countries development, which otherwise they could have saved for their retirement. Thus, considering their contributions, the authorities must give them the money for their basic needs such as, shelter, food, health care, which is all available in the old age home.
Another reason for the government to pay for the old people is that it makes the nation prosperous and motivates the younger people for the development of their country. This sets an example that how the country returns favor and care for their old people and thus, make a good impression on young generations which encourages them to keep on striving for their nation. Moreover, the prosperity of the older generations is an example for others as they can see that as they contributed to the nation when they were young, the authorities also think and cares for them and they don’t have to get worried for their future as the government has a proper scheme for them.
In conclusion, I think that the authorities should be responsible for its old population as it is for other citizens and should provide them with expenses for their accommodation and necessities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | Skinny | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | Arshdeep0900 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | Firdouspathan | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-16 | Assemkhidhr | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | Maryagema | 56 | view |
- In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them Sometimes the government has to pay for this care Who do you think should pay for this care the government or the family 61
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cell phone tracking and security cameras In many cases the people being monitered are unaware that this is happening Do you think the advantages 61
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spend somewhere else To what extent do you agree with this view 61
- In some parts of the world it is becoming popular to research the history of one s own family Why might people want to do this Is it a positive or negative development 67
- A friend has written to you asking for advice about a problem at work You have had a similar problem in the past Write a reply to your friend In your letter Tell your friend you understand the problem Explain what happened to you in the past Suggest possi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...g fraction of their earning towards the countries development, which otherwise they could...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 597, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worried about'?
Suggestion: worried about
...res for them and they don’t have to get worried for their future as the government has a pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, so, thus, as to, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88294314381 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6808935637 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484949832776 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.963228181 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.222222222 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2222222222 20.7667163134 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8888888889 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452464560513 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22093364892 0.084324248473 262% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112078295358 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305905223579 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090800182254 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.