Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity?
Although bicycles of course are more eco-friendly transportation option than cars, not many people around the world use them to commute. There are some underlying reasons such as either the dearth of appropriate cycling route or personal reluctance. However, there are different feasible solutions that can be taken to address this issue.
To begin with, perhaps the main reason why cycling is unpopular in many countries is the fact that there are not suitable cycling route. Obviously, cycling could be less secure mode of transportation if cyclists are expected to ride in highways or streets. This would discourage people from bicycling. Secondly, thanks to the modern technological advancements which trigger a sedentary lifestyle, laziness of people is another deterrent that hinder the popularity of cycling. Not only young generation but also elderly people, nowadays, would rather use other modes of transportation such as metro or trains, since they are more convenient and faster.
Turning to measures, probably, educating people about the positive effects of cycling both on the environment and on the physical and mental health of residents is the most effective solution. If public awareness about possible benefits raise, they may prefer to ride bicycles rather than their private cars or other vehicles, therefore, the popularity of cycling might increase significantly. Furthermore, providing enough and safe routes, all around the cities, is expected to play a vital role to ensure people about the possible dangerous, consequently, the popularity of cycling will increase.
Finally, implement of some policies such as offering more social benefits would create incentives and stimulate people to use bicycles. For example, discount on recreational activities like concert tickets may encourage citizens, especially the youngsters, to ride bicycles.
In conclusion, despite all mentioned reasons, there are some feasible solutions including educational programmers and providing appropriate rotes to encourage people using bicycle as a transportation mode.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77597402597 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99108101022 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8825585999 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.071428571 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221126313789 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648332415239 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574969712759 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102709730706 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656371218067 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.