Controversy related to financial liability of education from pre-school to university is always point of contention to politicians and bureaucrats. Though I am a supporter of free education to all, my concern does not agree with the statement in-total. Ofcourse, right to education is fundamental and government is responsible for free and quality education. However, it should be limited to only primary and preschool classes, rather than extending support all the way to university. In this essay, we will ascertain some issues related to the argument and arrive for valid conclusion.
First of all, economical burden created by unpaid academic service, hampers goverment sustainable overall development. Certainly, for countries like India, heavy population is challenging factor for providing absolutely free education, which is impractical. On the other hand, teaching resources like educators, staff,library cannot be uniformly distributed. Hence, academicians recommend providing basic education for free and use merit system to continue the service at later stages. Educational policy in United Kingdom is noteworthy, where it fits the above discussed example and successful in bringing young talents. Several other European countries are also following same methods and thus achieving desirable targets.
Furthermore, costs in university studies is at exponential rate in comparision to primary and secondary schools. Professional degrees like Medicine requires high maintenance labs and technicians where reasonable support from interested applicants is must. In addition, concentrated inflow of money to one exclusive sector will bring mismanagement in other fields like health industry. Present scenario is worth mentioning of how governments slowly redirecting various bodies under privatisation. This being the case, it's hard to expect from officials for fiscal policies dedicating entirely for education. Ofcourse, low literacy rate can be tackled by announcing incentives for joining schools.However, bachelors degree and upper education should be provided solely on basis of rank. Thus sincere and quality students will be encouraged without any problem.
In conclusion, free education to all is not advisable, unless prior budget is allocated to it. Surely, developed countries have better infrastructure but not suitable to other nations. Hence, it is always better to have sustainable support to all sectors by providing reasonable funds to academic institutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , library
...teaching resources like educators, staff,library cannot be uniformly distributed. Hence,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 695, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...nouncing incentives for joining schools.However, bachelors degree and upper education s...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 785, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ld be provided solely on basis of rank. Thus sincere and quality students will be en...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98603351955 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16812608287 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656424581006 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.5626866736 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.047619048 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0476190476 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23881045136 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613583996821 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504618256174 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134741889046 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707127771604 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.