Employer sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these view and give your own opinion.
People have different views about the employer’s benefit of requiring applicants’ personal information, such as hobbies and interests or marital status. While some people claim this information is irrelevant and useless, I believe that there are more benefits of collecting this data for employer in recruiting decision than drawbacks.
On the one hand, employers need more than just the professional information to assess their prospective candidates. The primary advantage is helping the company select the best-fit candidates for a vacation. For instance, several applications may be deemed fit for the place based on their qualification and work history. However, this place that requires travelling often to various company’s branches over the country will not good-fit for married people because of their marital commitment. Moreover, with increasing emphasis on collaborate working culture, collecting extracurricular and personal information will help the employer choose the employee that fit into common characteristics of other team members. This choice maybe reduce internal conflict, increase the outcome of the team as well as the company and therefore improve employee retention rate.
On the other hand, many of those who disagree with this argument doubt the authenticity of such information provided in the job applications. Because this is personal information, there are unable to cross check for accuracy. They believe that the job applicants tend to make up some hobbies and interests just to impress the employers. According to a survey conducted by a student group from Foreign Trade University, only 40% of the respondents gave genuine answers when asked about their extracurricular interests.
In conclusion, I would argue that collecting personal information is beneficial for the employer in decision-making. The more information company gathers about applicants, the better the recruitment will be.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | jeetender | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | PALAK AHUJA | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | MihirGosai | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Harrynguyen1980 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | namodi17 | 73 | view |
- You recently attended a meeting at a hotel. When you returned home, you found you had left some important papers at the hotel. Write a letter to the manager of the hotel. In your letterSay where you think you left the papersExplain why they are so importa 73
- Some people say that all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree. 67
- Employer sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these vi 78
- Your local council is considering closing a sports and leisure centre that is runs, in order to save money. Write a letter to the local council. In your letterGive details of how you and your friends or family use the centreExplain why the sports and leis 87
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job. You think he/she would get a job. Write a letter to this friend. In your letter.Say why he/she would not enjoy going to collegeExplain wh 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8041958042 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23797368247 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601398601399 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2132072933 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.571428571 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33813347516 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108955464041 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509973025015 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200006604711 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375179479346 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.