Employers should focus on the personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree with this?
These days, employers find it exponentially difficult to get the perfect fit for vacancies in their establishment. They often have to consider so much data on their potential candidates. However there is the opinion that employers should concentrate on a person’s qualities over his certifications and experience. I agree to an extent with this opinion because I expect that the candidate must first of all have met the minimum requirement for the job at hand.
Although employees tend to find it hard to get the choice candidate, there is no shortage of candidates who, in theory, fit the roles on offer. In other words, a lot of people with the right qualifications and experience are in the pool so it is imperative that at the initial stage, employers should first of all disqualify candidates who do not meet the minimum qualification and experience requirements.
When the shortlisting has been done, then employers can then set their sights on the temperament and character of their candidates that they believe would be a good fit for the job on offer. This stage is important because employers are looking for candidate that are passionate about the job and about making a positive difference in the organization.
To conclude, the employment process is not easy. Employers have to go through tons of information about potential employees to get their candidates but as long as they priorities personal qualities of candidates of equal footing in terms of qualification they often would get the right candidate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-17 | rihanaya | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Singh009 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-23 | mandeepKSharma | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | samlekhi | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | ADEYOMOLA ADEBAYO | 73 | view |
- Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities and towns, leaving only old people in the countryside? What problem does this cause? What can be done to solve this problem? 73
- Employers should focus on the personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree with this? 89
- Young People Are Leaving Their Homes And Villages And Moving To Cities 73
- Zoos are inhumane and should be abolished To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 83
- In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility.Discuss both these views and give your o 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ishment. They often have to consider so much data on their potential candidates. How...
^^^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...uch data on their potential candidates. However there is the opinion that employers sho...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'would' and 'get'.
Suggestion: would often get
... footing in terms of qualification they often would get the right candidate.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, then, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.148 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12850379575 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.8259978712 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.7 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265911332541 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995175624144 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691092415637 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153724702344 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472988278115 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.