Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
These days, organizations occasionally request job seekers for private details, namely pastimes, interests and marital status. While some people are of the opinion that such information may be linked and worthy, others think that such data is irrelevant and of no merit.
On the one hand, hiring companies have benefits for acquiring information about candidates. The primary advantage is that leisure activities and interests of prospective employee enables multinational corporates to find the best fit for the vacancy. For example, new graduates or school leavers, do not have work relevant details on curriculum vitae but information such as hobbies and interests, and hiring companies can use it as a way to find out as a person, team player, competitive and so on. Furthermore, the matrimonial status of the job applicant allows the company to find good-fit for the appropriate role. For instance, a job position that demands frequent travelling to various metropolitan cities all over the world might not be feasible for a married candidate, due to family commitments.
On the other hand, there are demerits in employers asking private information of the aspirants. Firstly, the hobbies and interests of experienced candidates are least important. However, the ability to perform a job matters most, in other words, skills and qualification. Moreover, some employers resort to discriminatory practices by selecting potential hires based on their marital status. For example, not employing an aspirant even though fully qualified for the open position due to he or she is married.
To conclude, in my opinion, there is no particular thought about the right or wrong in demanding private information of the job applicants by employers. However, organizations should focus on equal employment opportunity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | jeetender | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | PALAK AHUJA | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | MihirGosai | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Harrynguyen1980 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | namodi17 | 73 | view |
- You recently started commuting to work by bicycle and discovered there is a problem with bicycle parking near the building where you work. Write a letter to the building manager and say. Explain the reason for using a bicycle to commute. What problems ha 89
- The increase in the amount of traffic is responsible for growing problems in many large cities and this has resulted in more traffic congestion, particularly at rush hour. What measures could be taken to deal with this problem? has been deleted. 61
- Should governments or teachers be responsible for what is to be taught in schools Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 81
- City council is planning to pull down one of the historic buildings in your town because they do not have funds to renovate it As a citizen you don t want it to happen Write a letter to the city council and say What is the importance of the building Why s 76
- Learning to manage money is one of the key aspects of adult life. How in your view can individuals best learn to manage their money? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49642857143 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10149527796 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617857142857 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5826788621 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305180905407 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905805762037 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511147791668 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164887533648 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628445474096 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.