Employers sometimes ask peoples applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both views

Although many people consider that the details collected by an employer regarding the marital status and interests is useful, others consider the opposite. In my opinion, an employer must get these details from the candidates for the job, to know about them, but should not make a selection decision basis this information.

On one hand, some people believe that the personal details, such as hobbies and interests or marital status, collected by an employer is useful. They sat that these details help an employer to know more about the personality of the candidate they are interviewing. These can be even useful to see if the candidate is the right fit for the team. The candidate can be very skillful but would be an outlier in the team with regards to the age and marital status. Thus, may not get well along with the team members and may impact the working environment.

On the other hand, some people argue that a candidate may exaggerate their interests to impress the interviewer. Further, it is believed that it would be unfair if a candidate is not selected just because of the martial status. Eventually this may result in rejecting a skillful candidate and selecting a dumb candidate, whose performance doesn’t match the requirements of the job.

In my opinion, it is difficult to judge a candidate basis this information as the candidate may not state the correct information. Thus, importance should be given on the facts such as University Education and work experience.
In conclusion, people may vary in their opinions, I think that the employer should get the details to get better understanding of the candidate but should not make the selection decision basis these details.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...os;t match the requirements of the job. In my opinion, it is difficult to judge ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, so, thus, well, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03169014085 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80895666611 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485915492958 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2875069974 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.923076923 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24080906724 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934618228751 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491740727628 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13760262243 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350031992764 0.056905535591 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.