Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
At present, epic number of languages are indispensable part of globalization for communicate to one another. In this global different languages are exploited by different regional people. To see eye to eye, at this perspective if some languages died out then it may lead destruction. There are Immense numbers of catalyses responsible behind that such as loss of tradition as well as some time it is not convenient to learn other languages.
To highlight the first claim, every languages have its own traditional as well as religious value for regional human beings. For an example, if some tribal languages no more then the literacy of this language may be a big puzzle for other ones. Some proponent also claim that due to the language they also miss their tradition in this huge global world.
To support the second perspective, in some rural area different sort of languages learned by these people may not fissible. In addition, multilingual people could not do there best as they may get confused by language. For an instance, my friend who live in Mumbai use English language in office ; Although they use their traditional Panjabi language in home. Furthermore, some psychologist claim that having different language at child level may have detrimental effect on mind.
To conclude this topic, myriad of languages have essential part of tradition as it is like spices of community. Moreover, learn a globalize language for some kind of people may not easier or possibal. I fremly advocate that it is very important to preserve a some traditional languages.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problem To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 61
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology in what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make Has this become a positive or negative development 68
- some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary School Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage 82
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a complusory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ample, if some tribal languages no more then the literacy of this language may be a ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l may have detrimental effect on mind. To conclude this topic, myriad of langua...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, well, in addition, kind of, sort of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09689922481 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88234734868 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.9786091249 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.9285714286 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268229175727 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103221950891 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485044347229 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180768525212 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261623970223 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ample, if some tribal languages no more then the literacy of this language may be a ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l may have detrimental effect on mind. To conclude this topic, myriad of langua...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, well, in addition, kind of, sort of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09689922481 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88234734868 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.9786091249 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.9285714286 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268229175727 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103221950891 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485044347229 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180768525212 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261623970223 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.