Food-safety violations, including using improved fertilizers and toxic chemicals to produce foods, are increasing at an alarming rate. What suggestions would you give to solve these problems?
Nowadays, using improved fertilizers and toxic chemicals to produce food is increasing at an alarming rate. There are some solutions which I suggest that will solve these problems.
First of all, the governments should attempt to keep an eye on the origins of foods, and in case they find food uncertificated, they should find out the producers and punish them. Severe punishment is likely to threaten them. They will be afraid of being imprisoned so that they will never relapse again. Secondly, the governments should extend the difficulties of the food safety certificate to improve the quality of food produced. The producers will be more careful in making and selling foods to their customers. Thirdly, the installation of a regular check for food safety is highly recommended because of its practicality. The government's having police to check food safety is a potential idea. Fourth, legislation on strict rules is necessary to be introduced. For example, the police can increase the fine for the food producers who are against the rules and produce cheap toxic food. Fifth, the consumers should raise awareness of the food they eat. Last but not least, information on the problems should be posted publicly on social networks and media which have a great effect on people so they can easily catch up with the situation of food-safety violations.
In conclusion, it is urgent to save people from food-safety violations and the government is most able to do something about it in many simple ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-13 | Thuc Linh Dinh | 78 | view |
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can government and individuals take to tackle the issue 67
- Some people think that hard working and determination are the key factors for being successful in the life other people feel that other factors are more important Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
- Some people are convinced that games online are a waste of time while others believe that games online can actually bring benefits about lots of benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Traffic jam has become increasingly problematic in big cities What are the causes and solutions to them 73
- Many people may work from home using modern technology today Some people think that only the workers benefit from this and not the employers Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08064516129 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81643339818 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592741935484 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2175423891 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352866363266 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125407751273 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138104247957 0.0667982634062 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28465852667 0.151304729494 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179806074068 0.056905535591 316% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.