Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. Do you agree or disagree?
School papers are the utmost effective method to evaluate the conduct of a scholar in learning institutes. However, constant assessments such as coursework or projects are not the best way to assess student's performance in the subject. It is agreed that the university theory test is considered a way to demonstrate how pupils perform in schools. This essay will analyze why practical assessments must be adequately held in class and why professors should not rely only on these exams to mark final grades for apprentices.
First and foremost, it is widely known that an examination will be held in the presence of teachers. It is sure that students will try all their efforts to do it; as a result, they cannot cheat on someone's effort. During all the time when students are sitting an exam, they must thoroughly be observed by the school's supervisors. Hence, they work on the exam by themselves not copying others' works. Moreover, paperwork can make sure that those who are deserving candidates are able to get good marks and outrank others. Therefore, the official paper is the common and effective way to examine the actual act of students.
In contrast, holding a school assessment regularly could not give an obvious picture of the academic achievement to teachers, also their parents. For example, in university or college, undergraduates can use someone's project tests and college lecturers fail to appraise their real accomplishment of disciples. Sadly, plagiarism can hamper apprentices from actively acquiring knowledge, then failing in later exams or even assessing to successful life due to the lack of knowledge and experience. Therefore, constant examinations cannot determine student's real grades
In conclusion, formal examinations can be seen as a universal and effective method for examining students' performance in class. However, to some extent, continual practical assessments cannot be the best way for teachers to depend on and determine the final grade for students' work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-19 | TuVo | 84 | view |
| 2018-03-13 | karan81093 | 82 | view |
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this Do you agree or disagree 73
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional culture are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as coursework or projects is not a satisfactory way to do this Do you agree or disagree 78
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this Do you agree or disagree 84
- International travel is becoming cheaper and countries are opening their door to more and more tourists Do the advantages of increased tourists outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'someones'' or 'someone's'?
Suggestion: someones'; someone's
...o it; as a result, they cannot cheat on someones effort. During all the time when studen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... paperwork can make sure that those who are deserving candidates are able to get good marks a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns cannot determine students real grades In conclusion, formal examinations can b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32075471698 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94751901769 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591194968553 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6360616355 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304487296791 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915340133471 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100462511476 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180254248512 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916301011202 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.