The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
The government should invest in public foundation rather than put investment into art, music and theatre. However, while I believe that art, music and theatre is worth spending funds, I agree that government need to invest funds in public service consistently.
With regards to art, music and theatre, they have clear and various advantages on both individual and society. Firstly, people from different countries which makes them talk in different languages can use art and music to express and communicate with each other. People can understand the sentiments and other cultures through colors and melody, to which can promote audiences' aesthetic a high level. Secondly, diverse and high-quality museums can not only attract thousands of visitors, but also improve countries' economy. For instance, Sydney's Opera house gained 24.5 million Dollar A in 2014. Besides the Opera house itself driving Sydney's tourism industry as well as service part.
As we all known, public service is the key to enhance people's happiness and the era is changing rapidly. Therefore it needs to be a constant process to be invested. Rather than being entertained by the sorts of art, insurance of people's basic life is public foundation instead . Consequently, public service has the priority during funding and should be seen as the persistent development.
To conclude, although the infrastructure constructing is the essential issue, art, music and theatre need to be valued at the same time. It's recommended that the authorities could give consideration to investment in art field while continuously improving public construction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 56 | view |
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should the government give more financial support to local film industries 67
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- my interpretation of civilization
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...piness and the era is changing rapidly. Therefore it needs to be a constant process to be...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... basic life is public foundation instead . Consequently, public service has the pr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46613545817 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87457205947 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637450199203 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2366799499 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297734066527 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972413470828 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110818121411 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195541898429 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149671193011 0.056905535591 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.