The government should make people take responsibility for their actions to the environment. To what extent do you agree?

The care of the environment has become one of the paramount issues all over the world. Most people reckon that a parliament should take action by blaming people for those problems related to our nature, whilst others believe that the government by itself needs to hold the responsibility for such circumstances. Personally, I somewhat agree with the second statement, but this essay will consider both points of view.
To begin with, honestly, people are the main source of damaging biodiversity, it is essential that they are responsible for all the problems in the Earth. By providing huge facilities to fabrics, driving cars that emit a sufficient amount of gases to pollute the air, throwing up the garbage without any opportunity to recycle it again people are guilty of the ramifications. Moreover, they are becoming addicted to technology and not even thinking about the environment
The government shoulders out the responsibility of not doing any actions to save the world, instead it takes an eye to economic growth and cares about the financial state of a country. These instances can be devastating to the environment. By making technology revolutions providing and organized by the parliament, crossing the boards and wishing to overtake other countries in all of the terms, the state of nature is being under collapse.
Overall, both people and government are the core of the world’s state. They are needed to bound together and work harmonically to encourage the future of our Earth.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peoples'?
Suggestion: peoples
...out any opportunity to recycle it again people are guilty of the ramifications. Moreov...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... wishing to overtake other countries in all of the terms, the state of nature is being und...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, honestly, if, moreover, second, so, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18442622951 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96661018691 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610655737705 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5510706924 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251552635908 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777645513676 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794486894239 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131598585732 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645524843152 0.056905535591 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.