Governments dthe underage children for getting full time jobs in certain countries Is it good thing or bad thing

Essay topics:

Governments dthe underage children for getting full-time jobs in certain countries. Is it good thing or bad thing?

Child labor has always been a heated concern across the globe. It is believed that adolescents should not be allowed to do full-time jobs in different countries and the government should enforce strict laws in this regard. I completely agree that the government should play its pivotal role as working full-time certainly has negative impacts. I shall elaborate my point of view with valid arguments and examples in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, predominantly, child labour is increasing at an alarming rate, particularly in underdeveloped countries like India & Pakistan. Children are forced to do work in order to support their families. By government intervention, children would be given the opportunity to take out time for studies to pursue their dream careers. According to the recent research, 50% of adolescents in India do full-time jobs and do not go to the school at all.
To elucidate my stance further, government ban on full-time jobs can prevent children physical and mental fatigue. Child labor dilemma has detrimental effects on adolescents mental & physical growth. Owing to the low literacy rate, they are given labor work that requires a lot of physical fatigue. These children suffer from fatal diseases like asthma, TB and cancer. Short term jobs can benefit children in taking care of themselves alongside helping their families to earn bread and butter. A study from London University shown that children working full-time in factories are 60% more inclined to get affected by incurable diseases like HIV or TB.
In a nutshell, it is of paramount importance that the government prohibit adolescents to do full-time work. This imposes will certainly bring a positive change not only on teenagers life but also in the society altogether.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teenagers'' or 'teenager's'?
Suggestion: teenagers'; teenager's
...nly bring a positive change not only on teenagers life but also in the society altogether...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in fact, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27561837456 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88089193124 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60777385159 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6462802995 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.3125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5625 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228236017089 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712629243403 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625500827323 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136240757168 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149387943804 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.