Modern communications mean that it’s no longer necessary to write letters.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
We are living in an era of technology, where we are getting an alternative for almost all the old things we used to do in past. Aforementioned topic “replacement of old communication mediums by modern means” is the one which has support of both the groups with a view of using and not using conventional ways of communication. There are people who have their own reasons to support old communication mediums and a majority is present as well who support the change in this area of life as well. According to my poor understanding, both have their own significance and benefits as well however, we should embrace the change with open arms and make ourselves ready for the change.
People who think that writing a letter is obsolete and should be replaced, have a logic of their own. If you further dig down in your research on this group, you will find a huge number of youngsters who are supporting these communication platforms. According to them, it is a waste of time and resources to write a letter, dispatch it and then wait for the reply as it takes a long time in this practice. They are in favor of using modern means of communication which includes Email, Text messages, Whatsapp, Twitter and other social media platforms. You can find that in offices where you have majority of young people working, they have created different groups on these social media apps which is helping them in closing their official matters in a more efficient ways as taking permission or giving some important information (to group or one on one) becomes more efficient and less time taking.
On the contrary, people who are in job for a long time till now and are not tech-savoy, are more comfortable in using conventional method of writing letters or sending fax for taking approvals. They have their own reasons of sticking to their logic which includes comfort zone, affection and security of information or data that they send to a specific recipient.
To conclude this, I would like to put my views which are in favor of adopting change but at the same time, we must not forget the values of old things/mediums which were in practice as this can help us in remembering our basics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-27 | sudheerssmg | 56 | view |
- Some people think that young people should follow older people's examples. Others believe it is quite natural for teenagers to challenge what old people say. Describe both point of views. Give your opinion with reasons and relevant examples. 61
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole.Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people say that schools do not do enough to teach young people about health. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 60
- Some people prefer to buy local products while others prefer international products To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Developed countries should take more refugees from poorer countries Do you agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...almost all the old things we used to do in past. Aforementioned topic 'replacement...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, well, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72513089005 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82506825813 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513089005236 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9265175027 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.416666667 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8333333333 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162885424479 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652341105202 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299453766459 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903716042624 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410903657032 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.