Growing population is a big problem in developing countries. Should Government provide new homes in the cities or countryside.

Increasing demographics have become an alarming concern for most of the developing countries, which further increases the demand for new homes. Whether government should consider cities for the development of new residences or should choose outskirt areas, is a debatable topic. Personally, I believe that while, countryside should be preserved for agriculture and farming, cities and towns should be utilized for this uncertain need.

To commence upon, as rural areas are well suitable for agriculture and farming practices, they should not be considered for urbanization. The existence of humans is directly dependent on the agricultural sources, so depletion of these sources would definitely result in scarcity of sustainable resources for the human life. Undoubtedly, urbanization would lead to deforestation, which would eventually have an adverse effect on human life as trees are the major source of oxygen. Moreover, outskirts usually lack from the basic amenities like transportation and education services. It would be a great hassle for the students to commute on a daily basis from the villages to their desired educational institutes.

On the contrary, urban areas being well facilitated can be more suitable for developments of residences. People can easily avail facilities for medical, transportation and education. The only concern in cities, is the limited space for construction of new houses. Vertical building blocks could be one possible solution for resolving the crisis of limited space. Apartments that are built vertically rather than horizontally, can save thousands of hectares of land and can thus be utilized more productively.

Overall, whilst countryside should be preserved for the agricultural purposes, urban areas can be more suitable and productive for the development of new houses.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xistence of humans is directly dependent on the agricultural sources, so depletio...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6897810219 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13517245187 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605839416058 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2158384707 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.357142857 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113210058345 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475273856021 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06952624132 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878650870379 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797372769265 0.056905535591 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.