International travel is becoming cheaper and countries are opening their door to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourists outweigh the disadvantages?
It is irrefutable that international tourism is the backbone and also plays an integral role in the economy of the country. Nowadays, more countries with lower traveling expenses and gradually opening their border largely to attract visitors come to any region of the world. Therefore, the positive impacts of the high levels of tourists certainly far outweigh the drawbacks. Thus, in this essay, I shall elaborate on my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument before deducing a proper conclusion.
To begin with, international travel has lots of beneficial impacts not only on the construction of the country's economic condition but also providing many job opportunities to local residents. Moving further, another pivotal aspect is that international travel is the main way to export cultural values to others from any part of the world. For example, when visitors come to Vietnam, they will be introduced to the cultural customs and practices of Vietnamese, such as the traditional dishes there. After that, they go back to their hometown, cook those foods, and then spread them to family members or acquaint individuals. Thus, more and more foreign people are known of Vietnam's specialties. Therefore, all these merits stand in good stead.
On the flip side, there are numerous drawbacks due to global tourism. One of the most alarming disadvantages is the increasing number of tourists can threaten the safety of the state. For instance, if a high level of tourists come to another country with no awareness of environmental protection, they will contribute to making the recreation sites' beauty of the state worse and is faded away rapidly due to the huge amount of litter and garbage. Thus, there will loss of urban beauty and lessen the profit of the tourism industry due to the lack of travelers later. This is the reason why many are against this statement.
On the whole, it is thought that the deleterious effects on the beauty of famous tourist places since lots of people come there without the environment's awareness. I tend to believe that if there are concerted efforts of both local authorities with residents will reduce this state.
To recapitulate, international tourism causes tourist attractions dangers because of the destruction of an increasing number of visitors if before they turn back to their town, they leave numerous waste. However, this disadvantageous side can be minimized if the government takes meaningful actions. Therefore, increasingly opening their door to welcome people from different regions to give strong support to the country's economy. This is why the positive sides of tourism can outweigh the negative aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'environments'' or 'environment's'?
Suggestion: environments'; environment's
...e lots of people come there without the environments awareness. I tend to believe that if th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, on the whole, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2248.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2037037037 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84604386938 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560185185185 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8723002203 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.047619048 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258242694425 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641058582318 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617590213467 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132891056081 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555366711154 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.