It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional culture are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
It is a debated issue that technology developments will put tradition to an end. Although there is an incompatibility between technology and customary culture, I strongly opposed to this statement and believe that technology advancement is offering huge backing to sustain tradition.
To begin with, innovational technology gives citizens opportunity to be able to protect the majority of ancient's culture because of all modern machines and new science. For example, the National Museum in Egypt has one of the most advanced security systems in the world. Thanks to the contribution of cameras, entry and exit routes, all the precious objects are made sure to be in safe hand. Therefore, all of the ancient things are well-preserved and can be passed down through the next generation.
In addition, communities can represent their local habits to other nationalities by technology develops. In fact, individuals can acquire the awareness and cultivate knowledge through numerous of program displayed on television. For instance, Korean dramas play a crucial role in the increasing number of tourists. Hence, culture worldwide can be known well by other societies through the Internet.
Finally, technology advances reduce the significant amount of time when humans need to manufacture customary objects in manually. To illustrate, the new progressing appliances in one's kitchen will help to achieve a variety of local cuisines and be involved in the long-lasting receipts with our old culture.
In conclusion, according to some people, technology development will demolish ways of life of a country. I completely believe that local habits can be flourish and sustainable by the backing of technology innovation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 403, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ade sure to be in safe hand. Therefore, all of the ancient things are well-preserved and c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...rate, the new progressing appliances in ones kitchen will help to achieve a variety ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5247148289 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14040360007 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627376425856 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5266499567 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.785714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255482160223 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795994941224 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068878952379 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135539269608 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622642323637 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.