It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people assert that the extinction of animals is the result of evolution, therefore no actions are required to protect the endangered species. I strongly disagree with the statement, the mindless human activities such as deforestation, hunting, and pollution are responsible for the changes in ecological balance.
To embark upon, humans are blessed with an intelligent mind, using which he can create, discover and invent, also, have the power to destroy, exploit and wipe out. Primarily, reckless cutting of trees for fulfilling the human needs results in the destruction of the natural habitat of wildlife birds and animals. Further, tress holds the capacity to bind the soil and are the sources of food and shelter for the flora and fauna, if we will demolish these sources then we will also eliminate their existence. For instance, a biological study has proven that the main clausal for the extinction of various animals such as rhinoceros, white tigers, is the ruination of their natural habitat, that obligates them to navigate to different places which cause their elimination.
Secondly, another crucial factor responsible for the demolition of wildlife is hunting and killing for the pursuit of fashion. In order to fulfil the demands of ever-growing industrialisation, the animals are hunted and killed for extraction of their skin to make leather and removal of bones and teeth for making ornaments. To exemplify, according to a survey, an approximate one hundred camels are killed in Rajasthan quarterly to extract their skin for making bags. Finally, the exaggeration of polluted air and water is also creating difficulty for the survival of animals. Moreover, global warming has also affected the ecological balance as a result, there is a reduction in rainfall, melting of glaciers and changes in weather, which is posing a huge threat to wildlife.
In conclusion, I admit that natural changes are responsible for the extinction of species but these processes are the results of deforestation, poaching and pollution. Thus, it is the responsibility of mankind to make this world a better place to live in.
- Measures have been put in place to improve road safety by reducing the speed limits Some people believe there are better alternatives Discuss both views and give your own opinion 87
- In many countries, it is now illegal to smoke in public places. It is only fair that people who wish to smoke should have to leave the building. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people say that the ONLY REASON for LEARNING a FOREIGN LANGUAGES is in order to TRAVEL TO OR WORK in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reason why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Rich countries should help poorer countries when they suffer natural disasters.Do you agree or disagree? 67
- DIFFERENT CULTURES are MIXING today and the world is becoming a GLOBAL VILLAGE. Is it a POSITIVE or a NEGATIVE development? Give your own opinion and examples. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts. To exemplify, according to a survey, an approximate one hundred camels are ki...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28235294118 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94520900029 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567647058824 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.4291915024 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.153846154 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157949428566 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576388939266 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469854266553 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106449219482 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030084663336 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.