It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, suchas the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

Essay topics:

It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such
as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

As technology has developed, people can now travel to remote natural areas. While this
trend is beneficial to some extent, I would argue that its disadvantages are more significant.
On the one hand, visiting isolated natural places has some benefits. Firstly, this is a newer
and more interesting type of travelling. Since going to other cities or countries has been
too common for most people, it might be more exciting for them to explore new places
such as the South Pole or the Amazon rainforest. This gives them valuable experiences and
unforgettable memories. Secondly, when visiting remote areas, people, especially
scientists, might acquire more knowledge about the natural habitat. For example, when
coming to the North Pole, scientists can learn about the life of polar bears which live far
away from humans.
On the other hand, I believe this development has far more drawbacks. The first one is that
travelling to remote natural areas can be risky if the travellers are not sufficiently prepared.
For instance, the temperature at the South Pole is usually very low, which adversely affects
people's health. Travelling to forests can also be dangerous as people have to face the risk
of being attacked by animals. Also, since visiting isolated places often requires a large
amount of investment in researching and ensuring the safety of travellers, the costs of
travelling tend to be high. Therefore, it seems like only scientists and rich people can afford
this activity, so this development is likely to benefit only a small group of individuals.
In conclusion, I believe the disadvantages of people being able to travel to remote areas
outweigh its advantages.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-21 bhatvishal@ 61 view
Essays by user bhatvishal@ :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29044117647 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83674669512 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1538406396 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 19.0 4.38176352705 434% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27673266902 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088804730399 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468953936002 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795728101104 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560757190919 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.