It is sometimes said that people who do work that is physically hard should be paid as much as people who do work that needs high-level qualifications. Do you agree or disagree?
The dignity of labour is sometimes not equally divided among all jobs. It is argued work that demand physical strength must be given a remuneration equal to that of professionally qualified posts. I disagree with this view as I believe manual labour hardly requires great skills, and also students might lose interest in professional courses if equal wages are offered to every job.
The prime reason for disagreeing to the notion of allocating an equal amount of money as salary to manual labour the same as a professional job is because of less or no own theoretical knowledge they assign with their work. Such workers commit duties on their company's demand and instruction or a professional's advice which means they solely rely on their muscular ability. On the other hand, skilful jobs relating to engineering and software fields require proper idea and knowledge that is only earned through years of studying academic books taught in universities. It is that, therefore, those skilled people possessing great knowledge over relevant subjects deserve higher payment than the former group. In other words, unskilled workers have no right to get paid equally as skill rich people.
Another significant factor, when students learn that physical labour is paid the same as a white-collar job, they will lose interest in professional courses. This is because of the fact that some of them realise it is unnecessary to spare their years to studying at university spending an inordinate amount of money since labour work also offer them equal wages. As a result, the nation will witness a dramatic reduction in the number of professional graduates every year and this situation is detrimental since a country's progress mostly depending on its engineers.
In conclusion, I feel that people involved in physical labour possess no book knowledge and they do not deserve equal wage as non-manual workers. Also, if both sectors are given the same salary, students will lose interest over the professional courses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professionals'' or 'professional's'?
Suggestion: professionals'; professional's
...ir companys demand and instruction or a professionals advice which means they solely rely on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 770, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...illed workers have no right to get paid equally as skill rich people. Another significa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...terest in professional courses. This is because of the fact that some of them realise it is unnecessary ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to equal'
Suggestion: to equal
... book knowledge and they do not deserve equal wage as non-manual workers. Also, if bo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75589266458 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.4743571671 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104248347533 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038572252609 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398986868706 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702642005127 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265008744664 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.